Why Going to Trial Might Be the Best Move for Your California Lemon Law Case.

When you buy or lease a new car in California, you expect it to run smoothly—especially with the state’s strong consumer protections like the California Lemon Law (formally known as the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act). But what happens when that vehicle turns out to be a lemon, and the manufacturer refuses to make it right?

Many consumers find themselves at a crossroads: should you settle with the automaker, or take your case to trial? While settling can be tempting for a quick resolution, here’s why going to trial may actually be the smarter move in a California Lemon Law case.

1. You Could Receive a Larger Payout

Settlements are often offered as a way for automakers to cut losses—not necessarily to do what’s fair. They typically try to lowball the consumer, offering just enough to make the problem go away. When you go to trial, however, a jury (or judge) may award you:

- Full refund of your vehicle (including down payment and monthly payments),

- Civil penalties up to two times your actual damages if the manufacturer willfully violated the law,

- Attorney’s fees and costs covered by the manufacturer.

This means that a trial can result in significantly more compensation than a pre-trial settlement.

2. It Sends a Message to Manufacturers

Automakers are more likely to take consumer complaints seriously when they know customers are willing to go all the way. When consumers settle early, manufacturers may see it as a cost of doing business. But when a case goes to trial—and especially when it results in penalties—they feel the pressure to clean up their act and treat future buyers better.

3. The California Lemon Law Strongly Favors Consumers

California is one of the most consumer-friendly states when it comes to lemon law protections. The law gives you the right to a refund or replacement vehicle if:

- Your vehicle has a substantial defect covered by the warranty,

- The manufacturer has had a reasonable number of attempts to repair the issue, and

- The defect affects safety, use, or value of the vehicle.

If your case meets these criteria, and the manufacturer refuses to resolve the matter fairly, the courts are often on your side—especially when you have a skilled lemon law attorney representing you.

4. The Law Covers Your Legal Fees

One of the biggest fears consumers have about going to trial is cost. But under California’s Lemon Law, the automaker is required to pay your attorney’s fees if you win. That means you can often hire a lemon law lawyer with no upfront fees, and still go the distance without worrying about out-of-pocket legal expenses.

5. Settlements Are Often Confidential — Trials Are Public

When you settle, the details often remain confidential. But a trial creates a public record, which can:

- Encourage more accountability from automakers,

- Help future lemon owners in similar situations,

- Raise awareness of recurring vehicle issues.

If you’re passionate about helping others avoid the same headaches, going to trial can amplify your voice.

Final Thoughts

Going to trial might sound intimidating—but in many cases, it’s the strongest path to justice in a California Lemon Law case. With the law on your side, an experienced attorney in your corner, and the potential for a more favorable outcome, it often makes more sense to fight it out in court rather than settle for less.

Don't settle for crumbs when you deserve a full meal. If you believe your car is a lemon, consult with a California Lemon Law attorney and explore your options. You may find that trial isn’t just the bold choice—it’s the right one.